Health Psychology Review

Health Psychology Review is the first review journal in health psychology, publishing theoretical, conceptual, and integrative review work that advances the discipline and strengthens its connections with related fields.《健康心理学评论》（Health Psychology Review）是健康心理学领域的第一份综述期刊，发表推动该学科发展并加强其与相关领域联系的理论、概念与整合性综述。

Scope

The journal's stated aim is to provide a leading environment for review, theory, and conceptual development in health psychology, with its official scope covering:刊物官方宗旨为健康心理学的综述、理论与概念发展提供一流平台，官方声明的征稿范围包括：

• Theoretical and conceptual work: contributions that develop, evaluate, or integrate theories and concepts in health psychology, including theory-based reviews of empirical research that yield integrative theoretical formulations.理论与概念工作： 开发、评价或整合健康心理学理论与概念的稿件，包括对实证研究进行理论导向综述并产出整合性理论框架的工作。
• Systematic and meta-analytic reviews: evaluative, integrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews of substantive issues in health psychology, covering topics such as health behaviour, stress and coping, chronic illness, and psychological interventions.系统与荟萃分析综述： 健康心理学实质性议题的评价性、整合性、荟萃分析与系统综述，涵盖健康行为、压力与应对、慢性病以及心理干预等主题。
• Interdisciplinary connections: reviews that develop connections between areas of health psychology and other disciplines, ranging from biology and medicine to policy-oriented research domains, and that consider the cross-cultural and cross-national relevance of theories and key concepts.跨学科联系： 发展健康心理学各领域与生物学、医学及政策导向研究等其他学科之间联系的综述，并考量理论与关键概念的跨文化与跨国相关性。
• Methods and measurement: articles focusing on methodological issues and problems of design and measurement in health psychology, provided they make a direct and substantial contribution to theory or to the advancement of research practice.方法与测量： 聚焦健康心理学方法学议题以及研究设计与测量问题的文章，但需对理论或研究实践进步做出直接且实质性的贡献。
• Article types: review articles, theoretical and conceptual papers, brief commentaries on progress in specific subfields, comments on existing theoretical models, and discussions of previously published articles.栏目设置： 接受综述文章、理论与概念论文、特定子领域进展的简要评论、对现有理论模型的评论以及对已发表文章的讨论。

History

• Founding: the journal was launched in 2007 as the first dedicated review journal in health psychology, created to provide a forum for theoretical and integrative scholarship in a rapidly growing discipline.创刊： 该刊 2007 年创刊，是健康心理学领域第一份专门综述期刊，旨在为快速发展学科中的理论与整合性学术研究提供论坛。
• Editorial lineage: the journal has been led by a succession of editors-in-chief from Europe and North America, each contributing to its development as a leading venue for review scholarship in health psychology.编辑传承： 该刊先后由来自欧洲与北美的多位主编领导，每位都为其发展成为健康心理学综述研究的一流平台做出了贡献。
• Current leadership: the journal is currently led by co-editors-in-chief from Ghent University and the University of Heidelberg, representing the international character of the health psychology field.现任领导： 该刊目前由来自根特大学与海德堡大学的联合主编共同领导，体现了健康心理学领域的国际化特征。

Editors

The journal is led by two editors-in-chief supported by associate editors, a methods editorial board, and an international editorial board:该刊由两位主编领导，副编辑、方法学编委会与国际编委会提供支持：

• Editors-in-chief: Geert Crombez of Ghent University, Belgium, whose research focuses on health psychology, pain, and behavioural medicine. Falko Sniehotta of the University of Heidelberg, Germany, whose research focuses on health behaviour change, self-regulation, and the implementation of health psychology interventions.主编： 比利时根特大学的海尔特·克龙贝兹（Geert Crombez），研究方向为健康心理学、疼痛与行为医学；德国海德堡大学的法尔科·施涅霍塔（Falko Sniehotta），研究方向为健康行为改变、自我调节以及健康心理学干预的实施。
• Associate and consulting editors: the editorial team includes associate editors across health psychology subfields, a research methods and data analysis editorial board, and a large international editorial board ensuring broad disciplinary and geographical coverage.副编辑与咨询编辑： 编辑团队包括覆盖健康心理学各子领域的副编辑、研究方法与数据分析编委会以及庞大的国际编委会，确保广泛的学科与地域覆盖。
• Review model: manuscripts undergo rigorous peer review based on initial editor screening and anonymised refereeing by at least two independent reviewers, with final decisions made by the editors-in-chief.评审模式： 稿件经编辑初筛后由至少两位独立审稿人匿名评审，进行严格同行评审，最终决定由主编做出。